Questions have begun to raise debate in regards to
professional photojournalism, of photographs that have been accused of being
fabricated, manifested and post-processed. According the New York Times, images
submitted to this years Press Photo competition, were disqualified due to a
certain degree of alteration and manipulation.
Contests, especially in a professional environment have the
pressure on those involved to be the best of the best. “We are pressured to do more and push the envelope-not so much for our vision but for our business model.”
World Press had a set of ethics that were very controlled
and straight forward for all contestants to review and understand.
Technology has opened new doors for those to edit and assess their
digital files. But in other cases, many
have used programs such as Photoshop to alter their photos, blurring their
images of reality, skewing the actual meaning or originality.
An example of an image disqualified from the competition. Image Source: http://photobusinessforum.blogspot.com/2010/03/world-press-photo-disqualification-of.html |
A photographer has the ability to adjust photographs with
filters and other visual aesthetic techniques.
As a photojournalist, it is in the job description to highlight reality
and life events to have the ability to tell stories individually. “I believe that many of us adopted certain techniques, not to change the truth of what we are attempting to articulate,but to make our images stand out from the crowd.”
Is photography true? Is the work of a photojournalist, and
some in particular, risk their lives to achieve, a fabrication? Having the ability to create a different
version of an image doesn’t necessarily make it a false interpretation, but yet
just a new analytical interpretation of the world we all live in. Honesty and
understanding are important ethical qualities that I can relate too with
photojournalists.
My Own Personal Set of Ethics
by Megen Navone
No comments:
Post a Comment